Question 1

1. Maybe. 2. Yes. 3. That will be difficulty. Technically speaking, while mailbox is not a part of the property (i.e. you don't own it), still it is within the owner's control (subject to relevant ordinances). Unless prior arrangement has been made, the previous owner no longer has rights to open the mailbox of the property once the sale is completed. The previous owner's action has constitute civil trespass in the civil law perspective. Although the previous owner was wrong, the problem here is you have to prove you were injured by the action of the previous owner, i.e. you have to show how the previous owner's action caused your damage. In this case, it is extremely difficult, as: a. It is unlikely that you have mails to the new property, given the property was just sold recently. b. You can't prove that any of your mails have been taken away. On that basis, the best you can do is $1 nominal damage. It is simply not worth the effort.

Answer

匿名
@guest ·
Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 495

Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 524
已更新 22 Mar. 2021

1. Maybe. 2. Yes. 3. That will be difficulty. Technically speaking, while mailbox is not a part of the property (i.e. you don't own it), still it is within the owner's control (subject to relevant ordinances). Unless prior arrangement has been made, the previous owner no longer has rights to open the mailbox of the property once the sale is completed. The previous owner's action has constitute civil trespass in the civil law perspective. Although the previous owner was wrong, the problem here is you have to prove you were injured by the action of the previous owner, i.e. you have to show how the previous owner's action caused your damage. In this case, it is extremely difficult, as: a. It is unlikely that you have mails to the new property, given the property was just sold recently. b. You can't prove that any of your mails have been taken away. On that basis, the best you can do is $1 nominal damage. It is simply not worth the effort.

Question 2

你可以告，但有無證據。被告證詞不可當唯一證據。

Answer

匿名
@guest ·
Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 495

Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 524
已更新 22 Mar. 2021

你可以告，但有無證據。被告證詞不可當唯一證據。

Question 3

成交日後可以開信箱足見尚未過戶，以過戶日為準。民法第七五八條第一項：「不動產物權，依法律行為而取得、設定、喪失及變更者，非經登記，不生效力。」。上開規定係屬「設權登記（創設登記）」，即創設物權之登記（登記要件主義），不動產物權，依法律行為而變動者，非經登記，則當事人間縱有物權變動之事實，在法律上亦絕對不生效力。亦稱「生效登記」或「絕對登記」。

Answer

匿名
@guest ·
Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 495

Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 524
已更新 22 Mar. 2021

成交日後可以開信箱足見尚未過戶，以過戶日為準。民法第七五八條第一項：「不動產物權，依法律行為而取得、設定、喪失及變更者，非經登記，不生效力。」。上開規定係屬「設權登記（創設登記）」，即創設物權之登記（登記要件主義），不動產物權，依法律行為而變動者，非經登記，則當事人間縱有物權變動之事實，在法律上亦絕對不生效力。亦稱「生效登記」或「絕對登記」。

Question 4

請問是要追討金錢嗎????????????????? 你們有遺失什麼東西嗎? (或是你們之前有糾紛了嗎? 提告是你們的權利，但自己要找對法條喔。有案例拿了別人的傳單，以竊盜罪辦理，最後罰金1千服一天勞役 ---------------------- 假設他有一樣信箱的鑰匙，那就換個信箱吧。然後跟前屋主好好溝通一下吧，就說若有收到他的信件會通知他的

Answer

匿名
@guest ·
Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 495

Deprecated: Function strftime() is deprecated in /var/www/oegod/library/Functions.php on line 524
已更新 22 Mar. 2021

請問是要追討金錢嗎????????????????? 你們有遺失什麼東西嗎? (或是你們之前有糾紛了嗎? 提告是你們的權利，但自己要找對法條喔。有案例拿了別人的傳單，以竊盜罪辦理，最後罰金1千服一天勞役 ---------------------- 假設他有一樣信箱的鑰匙，那就換個信箱吧。然後跟前屋主好好溝通一下吧，就說若有收到他的信件會通知他的

前業主在成交日後，開我的信箱，對方說沒有取信，可否告她? 這是否犯法?她承認前，我們已報警,請問可以怎樣追討?

有請各位大神立即登入回答問題！

歡迎, Guest!

相關問題